Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

BackgroundTheory of Mind (ToM) deficits are well-documented in right-hemisphere stroke but remain understudied in post-stroke aphasia. Prior work suggests that performance on tasks assessing ToM may be relatively preserved in aphasia and dissociable from language impairment, but these findings are based largely on small studies. This study examined performance on nonverbal false-belief tasks in post-stroke aphasia, its relationship with aphasia severity, and whether vascular brain health, operationalized using cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) markers, contributed to variability in performance. MethodsForty-four individuals with aphasia completed two nonverbal belief-reasoning tasks assessing spontaneous perspective-taking and self-perspective inhibition. Task accuracy served as the primary outcome. Linear regression models examined associations between task performance, aphasia severity (Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient), and CSVD markers, including white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, lacunes and enlarged perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia and centrum semiovale. ResultsPerformance was heterogeneous across tasks, with reduced performance observed in 23% of participants on the Reality-Unknown task and 36% on the Reality-Known task. Aphasia severity was not associated with task accuracy. Greater cerebral microbleed count was associated with lower accuracy on both tasks, while greater basal ganglia enlarged perivascular spaces burden showed a more selective association with lower performance. ConclusionsPerformance on nonverbal false-belief tasks in aphasia is variable and not explained by aphasia severity alone. These findings suggest that apparent ToM-related difficulties in aphasia may be shaped by broader vascular brain health, supporting a more multidimensional framework for interpreting social-cognitive task performance after stroke.

Objective: To assess ethnic disparities in time to hospital presentation, use of acute reperfusion therapies, and in-hospital treatment times among patients presenting with stroke in a Dutch emergency department. Methods: In this single-centre observational cohort study, we included patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke between September 2020 and September 2021. Patients were categorized by ethnicity (with or without migration background). Demographic and stroke characteristics were compared between groups. Outcomes included: rates of presentation outside therapeutic time window, acute reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)), and, when applicable, door-to-treatment time (DTTT), with a door-to-needle time (DTNT) and door-to-groin time (DTGT) for IVT and EVT respectively. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for age, sex, and NIHSS at presentation, where appropriate. Results: A total of 232 patients were included, of whom 62 (26.7%) had a migration background. These patients were younger (66.6 vs 71.2 years) and more frequently had diabetes (27.4% vs 15.9%). Sex distribution was similar (59.7% vs 60.6% male). Stroke etiology differed between groups with less cardio-embolism (4.8% vs 15.3%) and more small vessel disease (69.4% vs 48.2%) among patients with a migration background. These latter patients presented more often outside the therapeutic time window (53.2% vs 37.1%; OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.05-3.45). EVT was less frequently performed in patients with a migration background compared to those without (8.1% vs 22.4%; OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.75). There were no significant differences in treatment times (DTTT 38min vs 30min, DTNT 35min vs 26min, DTGT 64min vs 54min). Conclusion: Patients with a migration background were more likely to present outside the therapeutic time window and had a lower rate of EVT. In order to improve access for these patients, more insight into prehospital and within hospital barriers and facilitators for appropriate management are needed.

BackgroundGlobal cerebral anoxia is a leading cause of death and resuscitated patients often remained persistently affected by neurological deficits. While previous studies suggest that brain-heart electrophysiological interactions may predict severity and prognosis after hypoxic brain injury coma, little is known about the brain-heart dynamics at near-death. Gaining insight into these mechanisms is crucial for developing targeted interventions in critical conditions. ResultsUsing a rodent model of reversible systemic anoxia (n=29, male and female rats), we investigated whether brain-heart interactions during the asphyxia onset could predict the return of brain electrical activities after resuscitation. Electrophysiological recordings confirmed that cerebral activity declines following asphyxia, coinciding with increased heart rate variability. Notably, the strong coupling between cardiac parasympathetic activity and high-frequency brain activity in the somatosensory cortex and hippocampus serves as a key predictor of a favorable outcome. ConclusionOur study underscores the involvement of the brain-heart axis mechanisms in the physiology of dying and the potential prognostic significance of these mechanisms, paving the way for translational research into critical care, based on new characterizations of cardiac reflexes and brain-heart interactions.

BackgroundAlthough neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) is a common and debilitating feature of multiple system atrophy (MSA), little is known about the burden of symptoms in the real world. ObjectivesTo design and conduct a cross-sectional community-based research survey targeting patients with MSA, with and without nOH. MethodsWe recruited patients with MSA to complete an anonymous online survey covering three core themes: 1) timely diagnosis, 2) nOH pharmacotherapy and refractory symptoms, and 3) confidence in physician knowledge. Responses were grouped by pre-specified diagnostic certainty levels. Relationships between symptoms, function, and pharmacotherapy were assessed using univariate and multivariate methods. ResultsWe analyzed 259 respondents with a self-reported diagnosis of MSA (age: M=64.38, SD=8.09 years; 44% female). In total, 42% also had a diagnosis nOH; 40% had symptoms highly suspicious of nOH, but no diagnosis; and 21% reported having never had their blood pressure measured in the standing position at a clinical visit. Treatment with a pressor agent was independently associated with the presence of other symptoms of autonomic failure. Each additional nOH symptom reported increased the odds of requiring pharmacotherapy by 18%. Yet, despite anti-hypotensive medication use, 97% of patients reported limitations in their ability to bathe, cook, or arise from a chair/bed with 76% needing caregiver support for refractory nOH symptoms. ConclusionsThis cross-sectional representative sample shows nOH is underrecognized and undertreated in MSA patients, leading to substantial functional limitations. It is our hope that these findings are leveraged for planning future trials and advocating for better treatments.

Introduction Despite the proven benefits of reperfusion therapies in acute ischemic stroke, treatment decisions in the hyperacute phase remain complex and are rarely supported by individualized outcome predictions. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) offer potential real-time prognostic estimates, but prospective evidence of their feasibility and performance in routine clinical workflows is limited. Our aim is to prospectively evaluate real-time feasibility, usability, and predictive performance of an AI-based CDSS (VALIDATE-CDSS) for individualized outcome prediction in acute stroke care. Methods and analysis Prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolling consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting to three tertiary stroke centers. Clinical management will follow standard practice at the discretion of treating physicians. In parallel, a dedicated researcher will collect patient data in real time and input them into the VALIDATE-CDSS using a mobile application, operating in shadow mode without influencing clinical decisions. The system will generate individualized predictions of 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) for four treatment strategies (intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, combined therapy, or no reperfusion) at three sequential time points: baseline clinical data, non-contrast CT, and CT angiography. The primary outcome is the real-world feasibility and usability of the VALIDATE-CDSS in the hyperacute stroke workflow. Secondary outcomes include predictive performance, agreement between model-suggested and actual treatments, incremental value with increasing data availability, and assessment of potential bias across predefined subgroups. This study will provide prospective real-world evidence on the implementation and clinical potential of AI-based decision support for personalized treatment selection in acute ischemic stroke Ethics and dissemination Patient enrollment began after approval from the ethics committees of all participating centers. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open-access journals and conference presentations. Following open science principles, anonymized data and metadata will be made publicly available in the Zenodo repository upon study completion. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05622539).

Background: Rett Syndrome (RTT) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder affecting approximately 1 in 10,000 live female births worldwide. The Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ), remains one of the most widely used standardized behavioral assessment tools for RTT. However, the RSBQ was originally validated only in British English, limiting its applicability for Spanish-speaking caregivers and clinical centers across Latin America and Spain. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to develop and validate the comprehension of the Spanish translation of the RSBQ to ensure cultural and linguistic equivalence, enhance data reliability, and facilitate earlier, more accurate clinical assessments among Spanish-speaking RTT populations. Methods: Surveys were administered in two phases to Spanish-speaking caregivers between November 2023 and September 2025. Phase I consisted of 12 guided survey administrations with participants being able to ask clarifying questions and offer linguistic modifications of RSBQ questions. Phase II consisted of independent online administration of the refined Spanish RSBQ and a retest at least 7 days later. Participants were recruited through direct outreach and supported virtually during questionnaire completion. Results: Following data cleaning and quality control, a total of 51 caregivers successfully completed both surveys. The Spanish RSBQ demonstrated high caregiver comprehension and strong engagement across multiple Latin American countries, including Argentina, Mexico, and Peru. Responses were highly correlated between test and retest timepoints, and no question showed biased response distributions. A slight effect of response interval on test-retest correlation was observed, potentially indicating the impact of natural disease progression confounding retest evaluation for long (>80 day) intervals; however this effect did not impact the overall linguistic validation results as analysis of only <21 day test-retest responders confirmed the findings. Conclusions: This linguistic validation study represents the first formal step toward the clinical validation of the Spanish RSBQ, enabling broader inclusion of Spanish-speaking populations in RTT research. The collaborative, bilingual data collection strategy proved both feasible and effective, paving the way for multinational trials and expanding therapeutic accessibility through localized, patient-centered innovation.

ObjectiveUnlike several other fields of healthcare, little is known about the size of therapist effects on patient outcomes following rehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions. We aimed to estimate the proportion of variance in patient outcomes from a structured rehabilitation program explained by therapist effects. MethodsFor our observational cohort study we accessed data from the national multicentre Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D) osteoarthritis management program. Analyses included 23,021 consecutive eligible adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis (mean (SD) age 65.0 (9.8) years, 71% female) treated by 657 therapists between October 2014 and February 2019. The primary outcome was [&ge;]30% reduction in pain intensity on 0-100 VAS at 3 months. Therapist effects were estimated as the variance partition coefficient (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)) from two-level random intercept logistic regression models before and after adjusting for patient-level case-mix factors and therapist-level characteristics (number of patients treated, days since therapist certification). Analyses were repeated for a range of secondary outcomes using multiply imputed data and complete-case analysis. Results52% of patients reported a [&ge;]30% reduction in pain intensity on 0-100 VAS at 3 months. In the null model the ICC was 0.007 (95%CI: 0.005, 0.009), which changed little after adjusting for patient- and therapist-level covariates. Upper confidence limits for ICC estimates across all secondary outcomes in multiply imputed and complete case analyses were less than 0.03. ConclusionsIn a nationally implemented osteoarthritis management program delivered by trained healthcare professionals, therapist effects made a minimal contribution to variation in patient outcomes. KEY MESSAGESO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABS Therapist effects - defined as the effect of a given therapist on patient outcomes as compared to another therapist - have been observed in several fields of healthcare and have important consequences for selection, training, and service improvement. In musculoskeletal rehabilitation five previous studies suggest that 1-12% of variation in patient-reported outcomes may be attributable to therapist effects, but these estimates were based on relatively small datasets resulting in substantial uncertainty. What this study addsOur cohort study analysed registry data from 2014-2019 on 23,021 patients and 647 trained therapists from the nationally implemented GLA:D structured osteoarthritis management program in Denmark. We found that therapist effects accounted for less than 3% of total variation in patient-reported pain and quality of life outcomes 3 months after beginning the program How this study might affect research, practice, or policyOur findings suggest that contextual factors that relate to therapist effects - therapist characteristics or therapist-patient interaction and alliance - make a minimal contribution to variation in patient outcomes from this structured, group-based rehabilitation intervention. Any contextual effects must be attributable to alternative sources, e.g. patient expectations, intervention setting.

Age- and disease-related vestibular decline can cause dizziness and postural instability, motivating interventions such as noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS). nGVS is commonly delivered at "subsensory" amplitudes and explained by stochastic resonance, yet because galvanic stimulation directly modulates vestibular afferents, even imperceptible currents may also exert deterministic effects on balance. This study examined whether low-amplitude nGVS (<1 mA), as typically used in stochastic resonance paradigms, directly influences postural behavior through stimulus-response coupling. Twenty healthy young adults stood on a force plate with feet together and eyes closed on either a rigid surface or 10-cm foam. In randomized order, they completed 300-second trials with band-limited (0-30 Hz), zero-mean nGVS at {+/-}0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 mA. Coupling between the stimulation waveform and mediolateral ground-reaction force was assessed using coherence and time-cumulant density. Mean coherence was significant mainly at higher amplitudes (0.5-0.7 mA) on both surfaces, whereas time-cumulant density identified significant time-locked vestibular-evoked response components at much lower amplitudes, down to 0.1 mA. These included an early response around 135-155 ms and a later, prominent response around 360-410 ms. Individually, significant coherence was common at 0.5-0.7 mA (15-19 of 20 participants), while cumulant-based responses appeared in some participants even at 0.1 mA. Responses were clearer on foam, consistent with greater vestibular reliance when somatosensory input is less reliable. Overall, low-amplitude nGVS can entrain postural output, suggesting that balance changes during "subsensory" stimulation may reflect both stochastic-resonance-like effects and deterministic vestibular drive, underscoring the need to quantify coupling alongside performance outcomes.

Background: Cognitive impairment poses a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide, impacting patient autonomy, social participation, and quality of life, while placing a considerable burden on caregivers. Non pharmacological interventions, particularly cognitive training and non invasive brain stimulation, have emerged as promising therapeutic strategies. Objective: This study aims to quantify the synergistic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with cognitive training on cognitive function across a spectrum of pathologies that induce cognitive impairment. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed for randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of combined tDCS and cognitive training compared with cognitive training alone. The analysis was based on the GRADE framework for systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Results: Across 27 studies including 1,012 participants, tDCS combined with cognitive training showed a small effect compared with cognitive training alone (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15 0.56). The effect was found only immediately after the intervention and declined during follow-up. Conclusion: tDCS combined with cognitive training may provide a small, short term benefit for cognitive function, but high heterogeneity across studies and loss of effect at follow up underscore the need for larger, better standardized trials to clarify its clinical value.

The early somatosensory nuclei of the brainstem and thalamus are traditionally considered relays of bottom-up peripheral input, yet animal studies indicate that they also receive top-down cortical projections. Whether such top-down processing exists in humans remains unknown. Here, we used cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), in which peripheral somatosensory input is reduced or absent while cortical representations are preserved, to test whether top-down processing can elicit activation across the somatosensory nuclei. We combined 3 Tesla functional and quantitative MRI data to assess activity and structural integrity along the somatosensory hand pathway in 16 individuals with chronic cervical SCI (mean age {+/-} s.e.m.=52.4 {+/-} 3.5 years) and 20 age-, sex-, and handedness-matched able-bodied control subjects (mean age=50.8 {+/-} 3.5 years). Participants were visually cued to make overt or, in case of hand paralysis, attempted right- and left-hand movements. We quantified activation across the cuneate nucleus, ventroposterior lateral thalamus, and primary somatosensory hand cortex, and assessed macro- and microstructural indices sensitive to myelin and tissue integrity (MTsat, R2*). Despite reduced or absent peripheral input, SCI participants exhibited robust and lateralised activation across all levels of the somatosensory pathway. This pattern persisted even in a participant with complete hand paralysis who lacked bottom-up afferent input during the fMRI task, indicating that top-down processing alone is sufficient to drive activity in early somatosensory relays. We simultaneously observed structural degeneration in the cuneate nucleus of SCI participants, marked by reductions in volume and myelin-sensitive metrics, suggestive of secondary degeneration. The extent of atrophy was related to time since injury and reduced sensorimotor hand function, but showed no significant relationship with functional activation, suggesting that preserved corticocuneate signalling is not dependent on the degree of structural degeneration. Together, these findings provide the first evidence in humans that the cuneate nuclei are subject to both bottom-up and top-down somatosensory processing. Although these nuclei are vulnerable to structural atrophy following dorsal column injury, our results suggest that top-down processing remains intact decades after spinal cord injury. This may have implications for the development of rehabilitation treatments targeting preserved somatosensory processing after injury.

Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) face critical decisions regarding life-sustaining treatments, such as invasive mechanical ventilation and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Advance care planning and shared decision-making are standard supportive frameworks but they often fail to account for structural pressures like progressive decline, shifting patient values, and fear of becoming a burden that may influence decision-making. This study explores how patients with ALS interpret ventilator and care options amid progressive physical decline, thereby reconsidering approaches to decision support. Using a qualitative descriptive design, the researcher (a nurse/sociologist) conducted 2-3 hour home interviews with five purposively sampled patients with ALS. Data, including eye-tracking-aided responses, were analysed via Sandelowskis framework. Rigour was ensured through team-based triangulation, independent coding by two researchers, and a reflexive audit trail. Subjective narratives were prioritised without medical record cross-referencing to capture patients experiences. Four categories emerged: (1) Rewriting clinical prognosis into a narrative of exploration via peer models, where meeting active ventilator users transformed future perceptions; (2) The conflict between securing care infrastructure and the burden on family, which greatly influenced the will to survive; (3) Existential fluctuation, where patients intentions shifted with daily fulfilment and family events; and (4) Governance of the body via pre-emptive technology use and training carers as physical extensions. Findings showed decision-making was a multi-layered process redefining lifes meaning within social resources. This necessitate shifting from independent to relational autonomy, where agency relies on care infrastructure, not physical ability. Treatment choice is a dynamic exploration requiring narrative companions to support existential fluctuations. Professionals must coordinate environments to reduce patient indebtedness. Limitations include the small, resource-advantaged sample (N = 5) and reliance on subjective narratives without medical record verification. Living with ALS means governing a new self through relational support and continuous dialogue.

ObjectiveTo describe the design, feasibility, and baseline characteristics of the Migraine Impact on Neurocognitive Dynamics (MIND) study, a 30-day smartphone-based cohort for high-frequency assessment of cognition and symptoms in adults with migraine. BackgroundCognitive symptoms are an important component of migraine burden, but they are difficult to measure using single-visit testing or retrospective questionnaires. Repeated smartphone-based assessment may better capture real-world variability in cognition and symptoms. MethodsAdults meeting International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for migraine were enrolled remotely and completed 30 days of once-daily ecological momentary assessments and mobile cognitive tasks delivered through the Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change platform. Baseline measures assessed demographics, migraine characteristics, disability, mood, stress, and treatment patterns. Feasibility was evaluated using enrollment, completion, and retention metrics. ResultsA total of 177 participants enrolled (mean age 38.8 {+/-} 11.9 years; 79.7% female), including 80/177 (45.2%) with chronic migraine. Across the 30-day protocol, 3688 daily assessments were completed, representing 70.8% of all possible study days, and 70.6% of participants completed at least 20 days of monitoring. Completion remained above 60% across study days. At baseline, chronic migraine was associated with greater burden than low-frequency and high-frequency episodic migraine, including higher MIDAS scores (98.6 vs. 38.7 and 70.3), more days with concentration difficulty (16.0 vs. 7.9 and 11.5), and more days with functional interference (18.5 vs. 7.6 and 13.0). ConclusionsThe MIND study demonstrates the feasibility of high-frequency smartphone-based assessment of cognition and symptoms in migraine and provides a methodological foundation for future analyses of within-person cognitive and symptom dynamics across the migraine cycle.

Post-stroke cognitive recovery is difficult to predict using focal lesion characteristics alone. The brain's capacity to maintain cognitive function depends also on structural integrity of the whole brain. One way to measure brain health is through the severity of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) markers, which reflect aging-related pathologies that erode structural integrity. Here, we propose a composite measure of CSVD (cCSVD) integrating three independently validated biomarkers automatically quantified using T1-weighted MRIs: white matter hyperintensity volume (WMH; representing vascular injury), perivascular space count (PVS; putative glymphatic clearance), and brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD; structural atrophy). We hypothesize that cCSVD, which captures the shared variance across these CSVD biomarkers, will be a robust indicator of whole-brain structural integrity and predict cognitive changes 3 months after stroke. We analyzed 65 early subacute stroke survivors with assessments within 21 days (baseline) and at 90 days (follow-up) post-stroke. WMH volume, PVS count, and brain-PAD were quantified from baseline T1-weighted MRIs, and then residualized for age, sex, days since stroke, and intracranial volume. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the residualized biomarkers was used to derive cCSVD. Beta regression with stability selection using LASSO was used to model three outcomes: baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, follow-up MoCA scores, and longitudinal change (follow-up score adjusted for baseline score). Logistic regression was used to test if baseline cCSVD predicted improvement in those with baseline cognitive impairment (MoCA < 26). The PCA revealed that the first principal component (PC1) explained 43.1% of the total variance among WMH volume, PVS count, and brain-PAD. The three biomarkers contributed nearly equally to PC1, which was subsequently used as the baseline cCSVD score. Lower baseline cCSVD was significantly associated with better MoCA scores at follow-up ({beta} = -0.19, p = 0.009), even after adjusting for baseline MoCA ({beta} = -0.12, p = 0.042), and, importantly, outperformed all individual biomarkers. Furthermore, lower cCSVD at baseline significantly increased the likelihood of improving to cognitively unimpaired status at three months (OR = 0.34, p = 0.036), independent of age and education. The composite CSVD captures the additive impact of vascular injury, glymphatic dysfunction, and structural atrophy on recovery in a way that individual measures do not. cCSVD accounts for shared variance across these domains, reflecting a patient's latent capacity for cognitive recovery, where relative integrity in one CSVD domain may mitigate effects of another. This automated, T1-based framework offers a scalable tool for predicting post-stroke recovery.

Abstract Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus direct EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated within the 6- to 24-hour time window. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospective EVT registry from 10 comprehensive stroke centers in China and Singapore between 2019 and 2024. Eligible patients had anterior circulation LVO, underwent EVT within 6-24 hours of onset, had ASPECTS 6, NIHSS 6, and pre-stroke mRS 2. Patients were stratified into bridging IVT + EVT (IVT group) versus direct EVT alone (non-IVT group). Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) was performed to balance baseline covariates. The primary outcome was 3-month favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and 3-month mortality. In the matched cohort, binary outcomes were compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results: Of 772 included patients, 110 (14.2%) received bridging IVT and 662 (85.8%) received direct EVT. After propensity score matching, 202 non-IVT patients were matched to 101 IVT patients, with all covariates well-balanced (absolute SMD <0.10). In the matched cohort, bridging IVT was not associated with a significant difference in 3-month favorable outcome (44.55% vs. 47.03%; common OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.46), successful recanalization (91.09% vs. 90.10%; OR 1.11; 0.51-2.44), sICH (5.94% vs. 9.41%; OR 0.61; 0.24-1.58), HT (23.76% vs. 23.27%; OR 1.03; 0.57-1.85), or 3-month mortality (15.84% vs. 13.37%; OR 1.22; 0.62-2.37). Conclusion: In this large multicenter propensity score-matched analysis, bridging intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy in the 6- to 24-hour time window was not significantly associated with improved efficacy or increased safety risks compared with direct endovascular therapy alone.

Abstract Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a significant cause of disability worldwide. Current treatments, primarily intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), are limited by narrow time windows and reperfusion injury, leading to suboptimal outcomes for many patients. Chuanzhi Tongluo (CZTL), a traditional Chinese medicine, has been preliminarily recognized as a novel cerebral protection agent in animal models. Objectives: This trial investigates the efficacy and safety of CZTL capsule in patients with AIS who are not eligible for IVT or who experience early neurological deterioration after IVT. Methods and design: The CONCERN trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-control, randomized clinical study in China. An estimated 1,208 eligible participants will be consecutively randomized to receive CZTL capsule therapy or placebo in 1:1 ratio across approximately 70 stroke centers in China. All enrolled patients are orally administered 2 capsules of CZTL or placebo 3 times a day together with antiplatelet agents for 3 months. Outcomes: The primary endpoint is an excellent functional outcome, defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the mRS at 90 days. Lead safety endpoints included 90-day mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours. Conclusions: Results of CONCERN trial will determine the clinical efficacy and safety of the traditional Chinese medicine CZTL capsule in the treatment of AIS patients. Trial registry number: ChiCTR2300074147 (www.chictr.org.cn).

BackgroundSpinal cord injury (SCI) triggers remote pathological changes in supraspinal regions, including neuroendocrine dysfunction that manifests clinically as hyponatremia and central diabetes insipidus. Clinical observations of lesion-level dependency and sequential transformation between these disorders suggest a temporally ordered hypothalamic cascade in which a compensatory arginine vasopressin (AVP)-driven neuroendocrine surge may precede a later neuroinflammation and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated neuronal exhaustion. Direct transcriptomic evidence for the temporal ordering of these events, however, has been lacking. MethodsWe performed a dual-cohort transcriptomic analysis. A discovery cohort (NCBI Sequence Read Archive PRJNA953752) comprised hypothalamic tissue from adult male Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to high-thoracic (T3) SCI, low-thoracic (T10) SCI, or sham surgery, sampled at post-injury day 7 and analyzed with edgeR/DESeq2 (|log2FC| > 1, Padj < 0.05). An independent chronic-phase validation cohort (Gene Expression Omnibus GSE297887) of hippocampal tissue from SCI and sham mice was interrogated as a sensitive supraspinal proxy for remote neuroinflammatory and ER-stress signatures. Pre-defined gene panels covered neuroendocrine, neuroinflammation, and ER-stress/unfolded-protein-response categories. ResultsIn the discovery cohort, high-thoracic SCI produced a lesion-level-dependent neuroendocrine surge in the hypothalamus: Avp (fold change 7.23; Padj = 0.002), Oxt (fold change 14.25; Padj = 2.3 x 10-7), and Ucn3 (fold change 9.22; Padj = 0.002) were among the most significantly upregulated genes genome-wide, whereas low-thoracic SCI failed to reach significance for any of these targets. Classical neuroinflammation markers and canonical ER-stress effectors remained transcriptionally silent (all Padj > 0.69). The PERK-pathway sentinel genes Trib3 and Ppp1r15a/GADD34 exhibited coordinated sub-threshold trends indicative of early activation, and Avp expression was tightly correlated with Mmp9 (r = 0.833; P = 0.0004). In the chronic-phase validation cohort, microglial P2ry12 and ferroptosis signatures were significantly upregulated (P2ry12 fold change 1.33; P = 0.008) suggesting a primed microglial state, while ER-stress effectors remained silent. ConclusionsThese data support a temporally ordered hypothalamic cascade after SCI in which an early compensatory neuroendocrine surge precedes -- and may precipitate, through biosynthetic overload and blood-brain-barrier disruption -- a subsequent neuroinflammation and ER-stress crisis. The defined molecular window between neuroendocrine activation and inflammatory/ER-stress engagement identifies a candidate therapeutic window for early neuroprotective intervention in acute SCI.

This research demonstrates that the trans-aqueduct approach is a feasible, minimally invasive access pathway to the third ventricle, offering a potential route to the deep brain for therapeutic technologies. Further pre-clinical investigation is required to thoroughly evaluate physiological tolerance, trauma risk, and the long-term implications of intraventricular implantation. The third ventricle is a high-value site for neuromodulation due to its proximity to deep-brain targets, including the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi). This study defined the anatomical pathway; and evaluated the technical feasibility of retrograde access to the third ventricle via the cerebral aqueduct using minimally invasive interventional techniques. Evaluation was conducted in three phases using human MRI datasets (n=16; mean age 48.4 years) and cadaveric specimens (n=6; mean age 88.2 years). Phase 1 involved morphometric MRI analysis of the aqueduct and ventricles. Phase 2 tested trans-aqueduct access on cadaver specimens via fluoroscopically guided guidewires and catheters. Phase 3 utilized direct anatomical dissections on cadaver specimens (n=3) to morphometrically measure the third ventricular cavity and its relationship to deep-brain nuclei. Measurements across the sample groups showed a mean aqueduct diameter of 1.6 mm (SD=0.14). Third ventricle dimensions averaged 27.6 mm (ventral-dorsal), 19.9 mm (caudal-cranial), and 5.7 mm (lateral). Successful access to the third ventricle was achieved in 83% (5/6) of cadaveric specimens. The optimal technical configuration utilized a 0.018'' angled-tip guidewire and 5-6 Fr catheters; the aqueduct accommodated diameters up to 2.0 mm with minimal resistance. The STN and GPi were localized within 5-20 mm of the ventricular volumetric centroid. The trans-aqueduct approach is a technically feasible, minimally invasive pathway for accessing the third ventricle. This route offers a potential alternative for the delivery of therapeutic neurotechnologies. Further research is required to assess physiological tolerance, trauma risk, and the long-term safety of intraventricular implantation.

Disability worsening is the critical long-term outcome in multiple sclerosis, yet the Expanded Disability Status Scale incompletely captures neurological deterioration and has limited sensitivity in the short time windows of clinical trials. Composite endpoints incorporating functional measures have been proposed to address these limitations, but whether they reliably improve detection of treatment effects has not been established across trials. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of individual patient data from ten phase III randomised controlled trials (ASCEND, BRAVO, CONFIRM, DEFINE, EXPAND, INFORMS, OLYMPUS, OPERA I/II, and ORATORIO; n = 9,369), spanning relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis. Confirmed disability worsening was defined using harmonised criteria with the msprog package and confirmed at 24 weeks. Treatment effects were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models and combined across trials in a one-stage individual patient data framework. Composite endpoints were constructed from the Expanded Disability Status Scale, the timed 25-foot walk test, and the nine-hole peg test using logical unions (OR-type), intersections (AND-type), and majority-vote structures. Sensitivity to treatment effect was quantified using Z-scores (the ratio of the pooled log-hazard ratio to its standard error) and compared to the Expanded Disability Status Scale reference using interaction tests. Event rates varied across components: the timed walk test generated the highest rates (up to 46.8%) while the nine-hole peg test generated the lowest (as low as 2.1%). OR-type composite endpoints showed weaker treatment effects than the Expanded Disability Status Scale alone, with the largest reductions in sensitivity observed for endpoints incorporating the timed walk test ({Delta}Z up to +2.26; interaction p = 0.004). These findings were confirmed across disease subtypes and were pronounced in relapsing-remitting trials, where no composite endpoint outperformed the Expanded Disability Status Scale. In progressive multiple sclerosis, the combination of the Expanded Disability Status Scale and the nine-hole peg test showed numerically stronger treatment effects ({Delta}Z = -1.65), though interaction tests did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.051). Composite endpoints do not systematically improve treatment effect detection in multiple sclerosis trials. Increased event capture driven by the timed walk test introduces noise that dilutes the treatment signal rather than amplifying it, highlighting that event rate and endpoint quality are not interchangeable. Upper limb function assessed by the nine-hole peg test provides complementary and specific information, particularly in progressive disease. The combination of global disability and upper limb measures represents a promising direction for future endpoint development in progressive multiple sclerosis trials, warranting validation.

Motor memory retention is impaired in Parkinson's disease (PD), affecting long-term rehabilitation outcomes. It appears that NREM sleep could be beneficial for consolidation processes in PD, and could be leveraged with non-invasive sleep interventions. This study examined the effect of auditory targeted memory reactivation (TMR) during NREM sleep on the retention of a motor sequence learning finger tapping task in 20 PD and 20 healthy older adults (HOA). TMR was applied during a 2-hour nap and its effect on motor retention was post-nap, after 24-hours and with a dual-task. The impact of TMR on sleep electrophysiology was also evaluated. Results showed no effect of TMR on motor retention or dual-tasking, with no difference between the groups. However, the TMR intervention did increase slow-wave density and decreased spindle density in both groups, and slow-wave amplitude during the presentation of the auditory cues was positively associated with performance in HOA. In conclusion, TMR applied during a 2 hour nap did not enhance motor retention, but the changes in sleep physiological features could be linked to a possible underlying effect on memory processing that warrants further investigation.

Chronotype reflects individual circadian preference for timing of sleep, wakefulness, and peak performance and has been linked to variability in prefrontal cognitive function across the day. Whether chronotype independently relates to dual-task gait cost (DTC) and whether this relationship differs by cognitive task domain is unclear. Sixty-nine healthy young adults (37 female; mean age 21.3 years) completed the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). Spatiotemporal gait parameters were recorded with three-dimensional motion capture during single-task walking and three dual-task conditions: backward word spelling (5LWB; phonological), serial subtraction by seven (SS7; arithmetic), and reverse month recitation (RMR; sequential). DTC was calculated for eight gait parameters. Condition differences were assessed with nonparametric tests and post-hoc comparisons. Multiple linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and baseline gait velocity, tested the independent association between MEQ score and mean velocity DTC; exploratory Spearman correlations examined other parameters. SS7 produced the largest mean velocity DTC (-12.76%), significantly greater than 5LWB (-7.95%; p = 0.002) and RMR (-9.57%; p = 0.021). MEQ score independently predicted mean velocity DTC in 5LWB ({beta} = -0.51, p < 0.001, R{superscript 2} = 0.269) and RMR ({beta} = -0.55, p = 0.004, R{superscript 2} = 0.222), indicating greater morningness associated with better gait-speed preservation under cognitive load; the SS7 association was not significant ({beta} = -0.33, p = 0.071). Exploratory correlations showed MEQ-DTC associations across 7/8 parameters in 5LWB, 4/8 in RMR, and 3/8 in SS7. Chronotype is independently associated with dual-task gait cost in a task-domain-specific manner, with stronger effects for phonological and sequential tasks than for arithmetic processing. The SS7 condition yielded the largest interference but weakest chronotype modulation, suggesting arithmetic dual-task disruption may be less sensitive to circadian arousal. Fixed testing time and cross-sectional design warrant within-subject, multi-timepoint studies to confirm chronotype effects separate from time-of-day confounds.